Preview

Proceedings of Telecommunication Universities

Advanced search

Methodology for Justifying Robust Solutions for Managing the Production of a Chemical Industry Holding

https://doi.org/10.31854/1813-324X-2025-11-4-118-128

EDN: VKMQIQ

Abstract

The relevance of the study is determined by the need to identify production management solutions that ensure the required efficiency of its functioning under the influence of various disturbing factors.

Research objective: to identify ways to improve production efficiency by upgrading the automated production management system. During the study, simulation modeling of the production process and processing of its results using Rosenblatt ‒ Parzen methods and numerical n-fold integration were used to determine the probabilities of achieving a set of objectives. These probabilities made it possible to form a range of acceptable solutions for managing production operations and, using the centroid method, to select the optimal solution in terms of robustness.

Results. A methodology has been developed for justifying robust solutions for managing the production of a chemical industry holding company.

Novelty. The proposed methodology differs from existing ones in that it uses the criterion of maximizing robustness to find the optimal solution, which helps to find solutions that ensure the achievement of a set of production objectives even in the event of unforeseen circumstances or external disturbances in the future.

Practical significance. Implementing the proposed methodology as part of the existing mathematical support for the automated production management system of the chemical industry holding company will enable the introduction of a proactive approach to production management practices and significantly improve the efficiency of this process.

About the Authors

R. M. Vivchar
The Bonch-Bruevich Saint Petersburg State University of Telecommunications
Russian Federation


M. E. Kovalenko
Cifra LLC
Russian Federation


D. S. Dmitrienko
Cifra LLC
Russian Federation


A. I. Smirnov
Apatit JSC
Russian Federation


S. A. Cherkasov
Apatit JSC
Russian Federation


A. I. Zaitsev
The Bonch-Bruevich Saint Petersburg State University of Telecommunications
Russian Federation


R. V. Kirichek
The Bonch-Bruevich Saint Petersburg State University of Telecommunications
Russian Federation


References

1. Vivchar R.M., Druzin I.V., Kirichek R.V., Smirnov A.I., Cherkasov S.A. The concept of proactive production management of the chemical industry holding. Engineering Bulletin of the Don. 2025;8. (in Russ.)

2. Morozova O.V. Models of Quality Estimation of Multi-Parametric Management of Complicated Systems. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. 2018;4(100):161‒172. (in Russ.) DOI:10.21686/2413-2829-2018-4-161-172. EDN:XWBGXR

3. Ozernoi N.A., Dronov V.V., Knyazev N.V. Mathematical model of decision support for the formation of the optimal number of spare parts of protected control points. Proceedings of the Vth All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference on Current Issues of Engineering and Aerodrome Support for Aviation Basing in Modern Conditions and Ways to Solve Them, 06‒07 October 2021, Voronezh, Russian Federation. Voronezh: Military Educational and Scientific Center of the Air Force N.E. Zhukovsky and Yu.A. Gagarin Air Force Academy; 2021. p.33‒38. (in Russ.) EDN:YSMAZP

4. Dyakov A.N. A model of the process of maintaining the readiness of technological equipment with maintenance after failure. Proceedings of the Mozhaisky Military Space Academy. 2016;651:174‒179. (in Russ.) EDN:WEIZJB

5. Liferenko V.D., Gural D.A., Legkov K.E. Methodology for assessing the efficiency of decision-making on the use of near-earth space sensing tools. I-methods. 2021;13(4):4. (in Russ.) EDN:BXWCOM

6. Vivchar R.M., Reshetnikov D.V., Gerasimenko S.Yu. Techniyue of selection of parameters of a system of requisition re-quirements for space application to start. Modern high technologies. 2019;10-1:32‒37. (in Russ.) EDN:NOBIRX

7. Kleiman L.A. Decision-making technique in the problem of information management systems elements diagnostics. PNRPU Bulletin. Electrical engineering, information technology, control systems. 2021;38:90‒109. (in Russ.) DOI:10.15593/2224-9397/2021.2.05. EDN:FUUTHR

8. Reznikov B.A. Theory of Systems and Optimal Control. Part 3. Decision–Making in Conditions of Uncertainty and Adaptation. Ministry of Defense of the USSR Publ.; 1988. 140 p. (in Russ.)

9. Ermolyev Yu.M., Yastremsky A.I. Stochastic Models and Methods in Economic Planning. Moscow: Glavnaya redakciya fiziko-matematicheskoj literatury Publ.; 1979. 255 p. (in Russ.)

10. Kalinin V.N., Reznikov B.A., Varakin E.I. Theory of Systems and Optimal Control. Part 1. Basic Concepts, Mathematical Models and Methods of System Analysis. Leningrad: Mozhaisky Military Engineering and Space Institute Publ.; 1979. 319 p. (in Russ.)

11. Reznikov B.A. System Analysis and Methods of System Engineering. Part 1. Methodology of System Research. Modeling of Complex Systems. Ministry of Defense of the USSR Publ.; 1990, 522 p. (in Russ.)

12. Luchko S.V. Theory of Automatic Control. St. Petersburg: Mozhaisky Military Space Academy Publ.; 2007. 378 p. (in Russ.)

13. Anfilatov V.S., Yemelyanov A.A., Kukushkin A.A. System Analysis in Management. Moscow: Finansy i statistika Publ.; 2002. 368 p. (in Russ.)

14. Volkova V.N., Yemelyanov A.A. Theory of Systems and System Analysis in the Management of Organizations. Moscow: Finansy i statistika Publ.; 2006. 848 p. (in Russ.)

15. Silich V.A., Silich M.P. Theory of Systems and System Analysis. Tomsk: Publishing House of Tomsk Polytechnic University Publ.; 2011. 276 p. (in Russ.) EDN:RBBTZB

16. Ivanov V.A. Effective management decisions as the basis for the sustainability management team. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2010;4:64‒67. (in Russ.) EDN:PAIYAH

17. Lukina A.V. Methodology for assessing the sustainability of economic systems. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics.. 2013;7(61):14‒20. (in Russ.) EDN:QUUQHF

18. Zavgorodnyaya A.S. Methods of decision-making in adaptive management of sustainable development of agricultural enterprises. Fundamental research. 2020;9:36‒40. (in Russ.) DOI:10.17513/fr.42840. EDN:KDFCVI

19. Biliatdinov K.Z. Method of assessment of techical systems’ stability. Scientific and Technical Volga region Bulletin. 2020;10:25‒28. (in Russ.) EDN:LVVDFM

20. Bilyatdinov K.Z. Model of stability provision and methodology for assessing the stability of big technical systems during operation. International Journal of Open Information Technologies. 2022;9(10):32‒40. (in Russ.) EDN:FZTHQT

21. Starovoitov V.V., Golub Yu.I. Data normalization in machine learning. Informatics. 2021;3(18):83‒96. (in Russ.) DOI:10.37661/1816-0301-2021-18-3-83-96. EDN:JKAHKM

22. Parzen E. On Estimation of a Probability Density Function and Mode. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 1962;33(3):1065–1076. DOI:10.1214/aoms/1177704472


Review

For citations:


Vivchar R.M., Kovalenko M.E., Dmitrienko D.S., Smirnov A.I., Cherkasov S.A., Zaitsev A.I., Kirichek R.V. Methodology for Justifying Robust Solutions for Managing the Production of a Chemical Industry Holding. Proceedings of Telecommunication Universities. 2025;11(4):118-128. https://doi.org/10.31854/1813-324X-2025-11-4-118-128. EDN: VKMQIQ

Views: 7


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1813-324X (Print)
ISSN 2712-8830 (Online)