Artificial Intelligence-Based Aircraft Accident Threat Parrying Method
https://doi.org/10.31854/1813-324X2021-7-4-110-117
Abstract
An anti-aircraft accident method is proposed, implemented in the decision support module, which is the main element of the flight safety control system and is a dynamic expert system. On the basis of the proposed method, recommendations are formed to the threat countering crew accidents using the information about its psychophysical state, the technical state an aircraft, external influencing factors, as well as a forecast of changes in flight conditions. The advantage of the proposed method is the ability to identify the immediate threat of an accident, as well as the development of management decisions to reduce the impact of the cause of the accident on flight safety. The peculiarity of the method of parrying the threat of an aircraft accident is the classification of management decisions depending on the flight conditions of the aircraft, which will reduce the computational costs for generating a threat parrying signal. Numerical modeling of the work using the assessment of a set of decision support rules made it possible to confirm its performance. The results can be used in systems development for safety an aircraft’s flight, the mathematical support of decision support systems.
About the Author
А. KulikRussian Federation
Moscow, 105005, Russian Federation
References
1. Sapogov V.A., Anisimov K.S., Novozhilov A.V. Fail-Safe Computer System for Complex of Aircraft Flight Control Systems. Trudy MAI. 2011;45. (in Russ.)
2. Glubokaya M.G. The look of the onboard Decision Support System on Passenger Aircraft Takeoff Stage. Izvestiya RAN. Teoriya i sistemy upravleniya. 2009;3:105‒121. (in Russ.)
3. Shevchenko A.M., Nachinkina G.N., Solonnikov Y.I. Modeling of the Pilot Information Support Tools at the Aircraft Takeoff Stage. Proceedings of the Moscow Institute of Electromechanics and Automation (MIEA). 2012;5:54−64. (in Russ.)
4. Sukholitko V.A. Method of Operator Support in Dangerous Situations. Patent RF, no. 2205442 С1 G05D, 02.10.2001. (in Russ.)
5. Wolf W. Cyber-physical system. Computer. 2009;42(3):88−89. DOI:10.1109/MC.2009.81
6. Rad C.R., Hancu O., Takacs I.A., Olteanu G. Smart Monitoring of Potato Crop: A Cyber-Physical System Architecture Model in the Field of Precision Agriculture. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia. 2015;6:73–79. DOI:10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.08.041
7. Lee J., Bagheri B., Kao H.-A. A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry. 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters. 2015;3:18–23. DOI:10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001
8. Kupriyanovsky V., Namiot D., Sinyakov S. A Cyber-physical system as the basis for the digital economy. The International Journal of org Open Information Technologies. 2016;4(2):18−25.
9. Kosko B. Fuzzy Systems as Universal Approximators. IEEE Transactions on Computers. 1994;43(11):1329−1333. DOI:10.1109/12.324566
10. Cordon O., Herrera F.A. General study on genetic fuzzy systems. In Genetic Algorithms in Engineering and Computer Science. John Wiley & Sons; 1995. p.33−57.
11. Averchenkov V.I., Miroshnikov V.V., Podvesovskiy A.G., Korostelyov D.A. Fuzzu and Hierarchical Models for Decision Support in Software Systems Implementation. Proceedings of the 11th on Joint ConferenceKnowledge-Based Software Engineering, 17−20 September 2014, Volgograd, Russia. Communications in Computer and Information Science. Cham: Springer; 2014. vol.466. p.410−422. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-11854-3_35
12. Denisov M., Kozin A., Kamaev V., Davydova S. Solution on Decision Support in Determining of Repair Action Using Fuzzy Logic and Agent System. Proceedings of the 11th on Joint Conference Knowledge-Based Software Engineering, 17−20 September 2014, Volgograd, Russia. Communications in Computer and Information Science. Cham: Springer; 2014. vol.466. р.533−541. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-11854-3_46
13. Bolshakov A.A., Kulik A.A., Sergushov I.V., Skripal E.N. Design the Method for Aircraft Accident of Prediction. Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravlenie. 2018;19(6):416−423. (in Russ.) DOI:10.17587/mau.19.416-423
14. Bolshakov A.A., Kulik A.A., Sergushov I.V., Skripal E.N. Development the Control System Algorithms Functioning of Flight Safety for the Aircraft of Helicopter Type. Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2016;18(1-2): 358−362. (in Russ.)
15. Fedunov B.E., Prokhorov M.D. Conclusion on the Precedent Knowledge Bases Airborne Intelligence Systems. Iskusstvennyj intellekt i prinjatie reshenij. 2010;3:63−72. (in Russ.)
16. Bahanov L.E., Demkin M.A., Fedunov B.E. Mathematical model of aircraft motion for knowledge bases of on-board operational advising expert systems. Izvestiya RAN. Teoriya i sistemy upravleniya. 2010;1:103‒111. (in Russ.)
17. Nejmark M.S., Cesarskij L.G., Filimonyuk L.YU. Decision support model for aircraft entering the airport's area of responsibility. All-Russian Scientific-Technical Journal "Polyot" ("Flight"). 2013;3:31–37. (in Russ.)
18. Gavrilova Т.А., Horoshevskiy V.F. Knowledge Bases of Intelligent Systems. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ.; 2000. 384 p. (in Russ.)
19. Kuklev E.A. Flight Safety Control of the Basis of Uncertain Risk Evaluation with Non-Routine Flight Conditions Involved. Civil Aviation High Technologies. 2016;226:199−205. (in Russ.)
20. Bolshakov A.A., Kulik A.A., Sergushov I.V., Skripal E.N. Aviation Accident Threat Intelligent Assessment Method. Vestnik komp'iuternykh i informatsionnykh tekhnologii (Herald of Computer and Information Technologies). 2018;5(167):3−9. (in Russ.) DOI:10.14489/vkit.2018.05.pp.003-009
21. Kulik A.A. Development of Methods for Test of Air Flight Safety System. Vestnik of Samara State Technical University. Technical Sciences Series. 2019;4(64):30−42. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kulik А. Artificial Intelligence-Based Aircraft Accident Threat Parrying Method. Proceedings of Telecommunication Universities. 2021;7(4):110-117. https://doi.org/10.31854/1813-324X2021-7-4-110-117