Decision Support System for Finding an Optimal Postquantum Key Encapsulation Mechanism. Part 2. Prototype Evaluation
https://doi.org/10.31854/1813-324X-2021-7-4-78-84
Abstract
This is the final part of the series of articles devoted to the development of a decision support system for choosing the optimal post-quantum key encapsulation mechanism. Efficiency of the methodology proposed for choosing the optimal implementation of the post-quantum cryptographic algorithm is evaluated and substantiated. The economic feasibility of approach is shown and its positive impact on the quality of the cryptographic information protection subsystem is demonstrated. Efficiency comparison of the prototype of the decision support system with existing software products aimed at supporting decision-making in the field of information security is carried out. The consistency of prototype’s recommendations with the conclusions of analytical studies in the field of post-quantum cryptography is checked.
About the Authors
A. Vlasenko
Kuban State Technological University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Krasnodar, 350072, Russian Federation
M. Evsyukov
Kuban State Technological University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Krasnodar, 350072, Russian Federation
M. Putyato
Kuban State Technological University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Krasnodar, 350072, Russian Federation
A. Makaryan
Kuban State Technological University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Krasnodar, 350072, Russian Federation
References
1. Grinshteyn D., Zayonz А. Quantum Challenge. Modern Research of Quantum Mechanic’s Basics. Moscow: Intellect Publ.; 2012. 432 p. (in Russ.)
2. Shor P. Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer. SIAM Journal on Scienticand Statistical Computing. 1997;5(26):1484–1509. DOI:10.1137/S0097539795293172
3. Schneier B. Applied Cryptography. Protocols, Algorthms, and Source Code. Moscow: Triumph Publ.; 2002. 815 p. (in Russ.)
4. NIST Report. Submission Requirements and Evaluation Criteria for the Post-Quantum Cryptography Standartization Process. Gaithersburg: NIST; 2016. 25 p.
5. Alagic G., Alperin-Sheriff J., Apon D.et al. Status Report on the Second Round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Process. Gaithersburg: NIST; 2020. 39 p.
6. Alagic G., Alperin-Sheriff J., Apon D.et al. Status Report on the First Round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Process. Gaithersburg: NIST; 2019. 27 p.
7. Vlasenko A., Evsyukov M., Putyato M., Makaryan A. Decision Support System for Finding an Optimal Postquantum Key Encapsulation Mechanism. Part 1. Decision Making Algorithm. Proc. of Telecom. Universities. 2020;6(4):70‒79. (in Russ.) DOI:10.31854/1813-324X-2020-6-4-70-79
8. Larson E., Gray C. Project Management: The Managerial Process. NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2017. 688 p.
9. Wetzstein B., Karastoyanova D., Leymann F. Towards Management of SLA-Aware Business Processes Based on Key Performance Indicators. Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Business Process Modeling Development and Support, BPMDS’08, 16‒17 June 2008, Montpellier, France. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.623.3105& rep=rep1&type=pdf [Accessed 14 May 2021]
10. Almeida L., Respicio A. Decision support for selecting information security controls. Journal of Decision Systems. 2018;27(S1):173‒180. DOI:10.1080/12460125.2018.1468177
11. Ragozin Y. Management Decision Support System for Choosing Information Security Options. Moscow: Moscow State Industrial University Publ.; 2011. 23 p. (in Russ.)
12. Rahimov E. Models and Methods of Decision Support in an Intelligent Information Security System. Ufa: Ufa State Aviation Technical University Publ.; 2006. 21 p. (in Russ.)
13. OpenSSL. Cryptography and SSL/TLS Toolkit. Available from: https://www.openssl.org/ [Accessed 14th November 2021]
14. Lucenko M.S., Kiyan A.S., Kuznetsova T.U., Kuznetsov A.A. Analysis and Comparative Studies of Key Encapsulation Code Schemes Presented at the NIST PQC Competition. All-Ukrainian Interdepartmental Scientific and Technical Collection "Radiotekhnika". 2018;193. (in Russ.) Available from: https://nure.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/Scientific_editions/rvmnts_ 2018_193_8.pdf [Accessed 14th November 2021]
15. Moody D. Round2 of the NIST PQC “Competition” what was NIST thinking? // The 10th International Conference on Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQCrypto 2019), Chongqing, China, 8‒10 May 2019. URL: https://csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media Presentations/Round-2-of-the-NIST-PQC-Competition-What-was-NIST/images-media/pqcrypto-may2019-moody.pdf [Accessed 3rd November 2020]
16. Baan H., Bhattacharya S., Fluhrer S. et al. Round5: KEM and PKE based on (Ring) Learning with Rounding // Round 5. Available from: https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/Post-Quantum-Cryptography/Round-2-Submissions [Accessed 14th November 2021]
17. Vlasenko A.V., Evsyukov M.V., Putyato М.М., Makaryan A.S. Research of Key Encapsulation Mechanisms Based on Postquantum Cryptographic Algorithms. Caspian journal: Management and High Technologies. 2019;4(48):121‒127. (in Russ.) DOI:10.21672/2074-1707.2019.48.4.121-127
18. Nist software perfomance tests. SAFEcrypto. Available from: https://www.safecrypto.eu/pqclounge [Accessed 14th November 2021]
Review
For citations:
Vlasenko A., Evsyukov M., Putyato M., Makaryan A. Decision Support System for Finding an Optimal Postquantum Key Encapsulation Mechanism. Part 2. Prototype Evaluation. Proceedings of Telecommunication Universities. 2021;7(4):78-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31854/1813-324X-2021-7-4-78-84
Views:
715
Email this article 